Does anyone actually read the works of contemporary scientists that profess a belief in a creator?

Several questons have been asked about physcists and mathematicians professing a belief in god. Can we be clear here. One must sperate the personal belief from the works. The works these gentleman have published are peer reviewed science and mathematics and contain no references whatsoever to a god-or intelligent designer or whatever. These articles in physics are peer reviewed and firmly grounded in the scientific methold. In seeing the complexity of our universe--these gentleman profess the personal philosophy that there must be a designer. This is their right--but has nothing to do with their science or mathematics. Religion is a philosophy--philosophy is not subject to scientific investiagtion. So isn't it wrong to say science agrees religion? Science is quiet on religion because religion by definition can't be evaluated scientifically. Science at best is quiet on religon is it not? People can be vocal about their beliefs--doesn't mean their science is valid or invalid--evidence only makes science valid or invalid.